Go to Source
Author: Cam Thompson
Cboe on Friday submitted four updated 19b-4 filings for spot bitcoin ETFs, according to it its website.
The updated filings were submitted for Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF, VanEck Bitcoin Trust, WisdomTree Bitcoin Trust and Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust.
The move followed an earlier report from the Wall Street Journal that said the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission told the Nasdaq and Cboe exchanges that recent filings from BlackRock, Fidelity and others for spot bitcoin ETF funds weren’t “clear and comprehensive.”
Cboe had said it intended to update its filings.
© 2023 The Block Crypto, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.
Go to Source
Author: Nathan Crooks
Go to Source
Author: Nikhilesh De
Go to Source
Author: Cam Thompson
Go to Source
Author: Eliza Gkritsi
The team behind the blue-chip NFT project Azuki addressed community concerns regarding the Elementals drop this week.
“The team stated that the core focus of Azuki is to not only deliver a product, but to also deliver an experience,” Azuki member Arcanic wrote in a summary of a Q&A with the team. “Many iterations and body-types were created while experimenting. But the team wanted to capture the same feeling that people got when browsing through the OG Azuki collection. This was their intent, but they missed the mark here.”
The team also addressed the mint mechanics, in which minters saw the true Azuki artwork after the mint finished. The hit NFT project NBA Top Shot inspired the Azuki team to go for a live reveal fo the artwork, integrating AI and social media to augment the minting process. “They agree they missed the mark here too,” Arcanic notes.
To prevent what occurred with the Elementals drop, the Azuki team will allow community members to vote on new moves. This entails updating the background of the Elementals artwork that the community has “full say” over.
What happened
The Azuki Elementals mint occurred on June 27, with the first 10 minutes reserved for Azuki NFT holders and the subsequent 10 minutes for Beanz Official holders. After those 20 minutes, the public was then set to have a chance to grab an Azuki NFT, which the team noted was an attempt to grow the community.
However, the mint sold out after just 15 minutes, netting Azuki $37.5 million.
The community raised concerns regarding the mint, stating that it failed to bring in new members as promised. What’s more, they claimed the Elementals art style appeared too similar to the original Azuki collection.

Azuki #1898. Image: OpenSea

Elemental #18705. Image: OpenSea
Long-term holders sold off their Azuki NFTs en masse after the Elementals mint, with sell-offs spiking 817%, The Block previously reported.
The future of Azuki
The Azuki team, meanwhile, has an animated series underway, which they will fully self-fund and release as shorts. “The team believes that the anime industry can be disrupted using decentralized IP/Web3 tech,” Arcanic wrote.
Azuki already published an animated teaser depicting Azuki Elemental avatars showing off powerful control over water, fire, lighting and earth.
“Imagine watching an anime, and afterwards you can interact with an NPC in the anime, whether that’s via Twitter or a web-app, and the NPC can issue you tokens with which you can interact,” Azuki team member Zagabond was quoted as saying.
Zagabond also teased at a second project in the works that tokenizes Azuki culture. “Nothing else is known about this,” Arcanic wrote. “So we will have to wait and see.”
© 2023 The Block Crypto, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.
Go to Source
Author: MK Manoylov
Go to Source
Author: Eliza Gkritsi
Go to Source
Author: Danny Nelson
Go to Source
Author: David Z. Morris
It was never going to be this simple.
Bitcoin’s price shot up nearly 25% in the two weeks following the news that investment giant BlackRock submitted an application with the Securities and Exchange Commission to offer a bitcoin spot exchange-traded fund. BlackRock has a sterling record with ETF applications and ETFs tend to make it easier for retail investors to access underlying assets, potentially pumping millions or billions more into various markets.
Bitcoin holders and investors saw the influential firm’s entrance into the historically crowded field of bitcoin spot ETF seekers as the chance for Charlie Brown to finally kick a football that’s been teed up for years.
But news first reported by the Wall Street Journal, that the SEC wants BlackRock and other recent applicants, including Nasdaq, Cboe and Fidelity, to revise and resubmit those applications didn’t surprise industry experts.
A spokesperson for the SEC declined to comment “on potential filings.” A Cboe spokesperson said it plans to update their filing and resubmit it to the SEC. Nasdaq, BlackRock and Fidelity declined to comment.
So you’re saying there’s a chance…
“The notion of a spot bitcoin ETF is very emotionally charged for some people, but it’s not unusual for the SEC to send applications back and ask for clarifications,” said Sean Tuffy, a financial regulatory expert.
Vivian Fang, a finance professor at Indiana University, sees the SEC’s move asking applicants to make changes to their applications as a step forward in the approval of a spot bitcoin ETF.
BlackRock, for example, will change the language and then work to quickly resubmit, though the SEC could still ask for more clarity, Fang said.
“I see this as very encouraging news as the SEC did not just go ahead and turn it down,” Fang said. “It basically kicked it back and said, work on the application and there is a chance that this may get approved.”
The SEC too likely wants “reputable” exchanges and asset managers involved with a spot bitcoin ETF, Fang added.
That may exclude existing crypto trading platforms, as none are registered as national securities exchanges, and most have listed assets that the SEC considers to be unregistered securities, likely complicating their ability to apply for that status.
Commingling of operations an issue
Financial regulators including the SEC have also raised concerns that the way most if not all are structured, with normally separate functions like exchange and broker-dealer services, and sometimes proprietary trading, under the same roof. Allegations of crypto trading platform providers betting against their own customers are one example of what concerns regulators about the combination of those functions, and regulators in the U.S. and elsewhere highlighted it as a major concern, even prior to the collapse of trading giant FTX.
“In other parts of our securities markets, the exchange, broker-dealer, and clearing functions are separate,” SEC Chair Gary Gensler said in a speech earlier this month. “Separation of these core functions helps mitigate the conflicts that can arise with the commingling of such services.”
Splitting those services might also help assuage the SEC’s longstanding hangup with bitcoin spot ETF applications: that the underlying market is opaque and prone to possible manipulation. The agency accuses Binance of market manipulation in its enforcement action against the crypto trading giant.
That’s ‘TradFi’s’ music
Tuffy saw this regulatory skepticism towards existing crypto trading platforms as an issue for ETF applications moving forward. Even putting aside the SEC’s recent enforcement action against Coinbase over the agency’s belief that Coinbase listed unregistered securities, among other violations the agency alleges, Coinbase isn’t registered as a national securities exchange, so they likely could not be used for the spot market surveillance sharing agreement central to the new applications.
The lack of compliance in the digital asset industry may clear the path for traditional financial giants to step into the void and provide that service, potentially leaving established crypto trading firms behind.
“If you have BlackRock co-sharing the monitoring duties with Nasdaq, it is a golden team, you can’t really beat that,” Fang said.
Tuffy also saw it as an opportunity for traditional financial institutions to step into a bigger role in crypto markets, seeing it as a possibility that Nasdaq accelerates their offering in reaction to the SEC’s guidance.
“I think overall it’s in-line with the SEC’s skepticism over the bitcoin ETF. But if you’re in the crypto world it’s sort of hopeful, because they didn’t outright reject it, they just asked for clarification,” said Tuffy.
But he added a dose of cold water.
“Ultimately I think that as long as Gary Gensler is in charge I don’t think we’re going to get a bitcoin ETF through, so I am skeptical about the outcome,” he said.
© 2023 The Block Crypto, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.
Go to Source
Author: Colin Wilhelm and Sarah Wynn