FreeCryptoCurrency.Me

Free stocks and money too!

Author: samwsimpson_lyjt8578

Crypto job ads surged by nearly 400% in 2021, says LinkedIn

LinkedIn, the popular social networking site for professionals, said last week that the number of job ads related to the digital asset industry soared in 2021.

Postings related to “bitcoin,” “blockchain,” “Ethereum,” and other terms surged 395% between 2020 and 2021, according to LinkedIn. By comparison, the broader tech sphere “saw a 98% increase in listings during the same time period.”

“While most of the job postings were in software and finance, other industries are also seeing a rise in demand for crypto talent. These include professional services like accounting and consulting, as well as the staffing and computer hardware sectors,” LinkedIn News noted in a post.

The Block has extensively covered the hiring boom taking place across the digital asset ecosystem. Fueling the activity is a shift in talent from traditional talent spheres to crypto. 

A survey of 27 crypto firms revealed a headcount increase of more than 8,400 people in the last year, with an average of over 300 people for each surveyed company. Predictably, exchanges and investment-oriented companies led the pack. 

© 2021 The Block Crypto, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Go to Source
Author: Michael McSweeney

Play-to-earn game Axie Infinity: Where does the money come from?

Quick Take

  • Axie Infinity is a play-to-earn game that hands out SLP tokens to its players.
  • The game currently gives out 187 million SLP tokens per day, worth $3.3 million.
  • But where does this value come from? And is it sustainable?

This feature story is available to
subscribers of The Block Daily.
You can continue reading
this Daily feature on The Block.

Go to Source
Author: Tim Copeland

Bitfinex withdraws from Ontario amid major push against centralized exchanges

On January 14, Bitfinex announced that it will close user accounts in Ontario at the beginning of March. In its announcement, the exchange wrote:

“Starting on March 1, 2022, Ontario customers will no longer have access to any Services. Any Ontario customers who have open positions in our peer-to-peer financing markets are advised to immediately start exiting those positions in preparation for March 1, 2022.”

Canadian securities regulators have been increasing oversight of custodial cryptocurrency exchanges, requiring them to register as securities exchanges or exit those respective provincial markets. As home to the largest equities market in the country, Ontario’s securities regulator has spearheaded these efforts. 

In August, The Block reported that the first two crypto platforms to receive the go-ahead from the Ontario Securities Commission had been barred from trading Tether, the operator of which shares a parent company with Bitfinex, iFinex.

The two companies are no strangers to legal troubles. The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission recently fined them, and they are still fighting to keep the New York Attorney General from handing over details of the NYAG’s case against Tether and Bitfinex to CoinDesk. 

At the end of December, the OSC accused Binance of misleading users in Ontario as to the exchange’s continued right to operate in the region. Binance later amended its statement to users. 

© 2021 The Block Crypto, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Go to Source
Author: Kollen Post

Shoe company Crocs is eyeing an NFT play, according to trademark application

Crocs, the popular shoe company, is looking to get into NFTs, according to a trademark application filed on January 11.

The application, first reported by CoinDesk, is marked for “Downloadable computer software for creating, managing, storing, accessing, sending, receiving, exchanging, validating and selling digital assets, digital collectibles, digital tokens and non-fungible tokens (NFTs).”

The filing is for “intent-to-use” basis, indicating that the brand plans to use it in commerce.

This news follows a larger trend of fashion retailers, and shoe brands, getting into NFTs. In December, Nike bought NFT collectibles startup RTFKT and Adidas netted some $23 million in sales after its first NFT drop, The Block reported in December.

Crocs did not respond to The Block’s request for comment by press time.

© 2021 The Block Crypto, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Go to Source
Author: Anushree Dave

A look at the fees.wtf airdrop and what went wrong

On Thursday evening, crypto information site fees.wtf launched an airdrop for members of the crypto community. Only, it didn’t go so well.

The website became popular because it enabled anyone to see how much they’ve spent in transaction fees on the Ethereum blockchain over the years. In some cases, people who spent a lot on transaction fees when ether (ETH) was cheaper could find out that those tokens would now be worth a lot more — sometimes even millions of dollars.

In accordance with this, the airdrop of WTF tokens was handed out proportionally, with more tokens given to those who had spent more in fees. The idea was that it was some kind of commiseration for the amounts spent.

Wallets with a minimum of 0.05 ETH spent on gas fees before the snapshot date of January 1, 2022, were eligible to claim the token. Someone claiming the minimum amount would receive around 30 WTF tokens.

The launch, however, did not go as planned as liquidity problems on exchanges caused significant headaches — and losses of funds. Plus, there were a number of additional elements that made the airdrop more costly than others.

Botched liquidity

When the token went live, it was available to trade on decentralized exchange Uniswap. Typically in these situations, the team will use some of its reserved tokens to provide liquidity on the exchange. This means that there are enough tokens on the exchange so traders can buy and sell without incurring large amounts of slippage (when the actual sale price is different from what was expected).

Yet the team failed to provide enough liquidity on Uniswap. It only had 2,211.455 WTF and 0.000001 ETH ($0.003). This meant that 1 ETH was equivalent to 2.211 billion WTF as of the time the pool was seeded.

This led to competition between a few trading bots in the first hours of trading that resulted in big winners and losers in the early minutes of trading. The first entity to buy WTF was able to acquire 2,211.45 WTF for 2 ETH ($6,400), which left only 0.01 WTF in the pool — according to an analysis by a crypto user known as meows.

This action caused the token price to spike, a situation that continued as more bots spent increasingly larger sums of ETH to acquire progressively smaller fractions of the remaining 0.01 WTF tokens in the pool. One buyer even spent 42 ETH ($138,600) to acquire just 0.00004 WTF, worth almost nothing as the coin’s price plummeted.

Then, when one bot purchased a small fraction of WTF for 10 ETH — followed by an instantaneous sale of the same tokens for 87 ETH — the price crashed. All of this happened within the first five minutes of the pool going live.

A few minutes later, one bot managed to swap a little over 2,200 tokens for 851 ETH ($2.8 million). They even paid a hefty $1,300 in transaction fees to do so.

The token’s price tanked over 96% from a temporary high of $2.96 to $0.13 following the bot action. Some users also reported being unable to sell the token on the Uniswap v3.

Addressing the issue, the WTF developers stated on the project’s Discord server that the problem was due to a one-sided LP on Uniswap v3. The action of the bot wars had drained liquidity from the pool but the WTF team stated that they were in contact with Uniswap to fix the problem.

Data from Dextools shows that buying and selling is currently ongoing on the WTF/ETH trading pair on Uniswap, so it appears the problem has been fixed. Some users, however, are still unable to load the project’s website.

Fees.wtf won the biggest airdrop

There was one big winner from the airdrop: fees.wtf itself. Despite the token launch not going smoothly, the website received more than a million dollars from fees and transaction levies.

To receive the airdrop, users had to “unlock” their wallets by paying 0.01 ETH ($34) to the project’s coffers, separate from the gas cost of the actual token claim transaction. Part of this could be returned to individuals via a referral scheme, although to get half of the fee as a reward, the referrer needed to burn thousands of WTF tokens. The WTF team earned over 147 ETH ($483,000) from “unlock fees” as of the time of writing, according to data from Etherscan. 

These payments to unlock wallet addresses are still ongoing as of the time of writing, even though the WTF token has lost 96% of its value since trading began. 

Beyond this, the team levied a 4% tax on any transfers of WTF, including trades made by users. Thus far, the project has made over 7.6 million WTF ($1 million) from this transaction tax.

In total, the WTF team is sitting on more than $1.48 million in both ETH and WTF tokens.

WTF’s seemingly botched launch is the latest in a series of airdrops to hit the market in the last three months that have left some users disappointed. OpenDAO’s SOS and GasDAO’s GAS tokens have failed to deliver high-value tokens, unlike the first big airdrops. Plus other airdrops have had quite restrictive eligibility requirements, such as Paraswap, excluding many people. At this rate, projects my question whether running an airdrop is a net positive — or if it might not be worth the hassle.

© 2021 The Block Crypto, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Go to Source
Author: Osato Avan-Nomayo

Deciphering the Metaverse: The Shifting Sands of Market Dominance

Quick Take

  • This weekly series explores the most interesting insights in NFTs, blockchain gaming, and virtual worlds
  • In an attempt to topple the leading platform in the space, NFT marketplace, LooksRare, launched its operations and made quite a splash with NFT traders and investors
  • As a testament to the constantly changing nature of the space, the NFT market witnessed many changes of leadership recently

This research piece is available to
members of The Block Genesis.
You can continue reading
this Genesis research on The Block.

Go to Source
Author: Thomas Bialek

USDC’s supply on Ethereum surpasses that of rival USDT’s for the first time

The total supply of the USDC stablecoin on the Ethereum blockchain has surpassed that of rival Tether’s (USDT) for the first time.

The current total supply of USDC on Ethereum stands at 39.92 billion, whereas USDT’s total supply on the blockchain stands at 39.82 billion, according to Etherscan.

USDC’s supply beating USDT’s on Ethereum is significant since the blockchain remains a major contributor of growth for both stablecoins. USDC and USDT are available on several blockchains, including Solana and Algorand.

DeFi driving growth 

One of the main reasons for USDC’s recent growth has been its increased usage in the decentralized finance (DeFi) market. Stablecoins are used for trading on decentralized exchanges and for various purposes within DeFi protocols.

USDT is different from its competitors “that rely mainly on DeFi platforms to boost their supply,” Tether CTO Paolo Ardoino told The Block. USDT’s demand is mainly driven by centralized exchange users and institutions, he said.

But with the recent bearish crypto market sentiment, USDT’s demand from institutions has decreased, said Ardoino, adding that demand from retail investors, however, is growing from Turkey and several countries in Latin America.

Looking at the bigger picture, USDT’s total supply across blockchain continues to remain higher than that of USDC’s. The former’s current total supply stands at over $82 billion, and the latter’s stands at around $45 billion.

USDT’s supply has been consistently increasing over the past several months, whereas USDT’s supply has remained somewhat stagnant.

Ardoino said there is a “sufficient amount” of USDT in circulation.

Freezing funds 

Tether has been increasingly freezing funds recently. Earlier this week, the stablecoin issuer blocked three Ethereum addresses holding over $160 million worth of USDT.

Regarding the freeze, Ardoino said, “Tether is cooperating with a law enforcement request, imposing a temporary freeze to allow the investigation to proceed.”

Last month, Tether froze over $1 million worth of USDT belonging to a single blockchain address.

© 2021 The Block Crypto, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Go to Source
Author: Yogita Khatri

Russian authorities raid REvil hackers, seize luxury cars and crypto

One of Russia’s most notorious ransomware gangs was hit by a major raid.

Russia’s Federal Security Service, or FSB, announced on January 14 a series of raids on 25 addresses associated with 14 REvil members in locations around Moscow, St. Petersburg and Lipetsk. 

The ad did not specify how many of the associated hackers were arrested, but news outlet RIA Novosti released a video depicting several of the arrests.

In those raids, the FSB said it confiscated 426 million rubles ($5.5 million) in cash and cryptocurrency, as well as $600,000 in USD and 500,000 euros. They also seized an unspecified number of crypto wallets and 20 luxury cars. 

According to the FSB, the agency conducted its raids in response to requests from U.S. authorities, which had identified REvil’s leadership. Russia’s ecosystem of cybergangs, especially those focused on ransomware, has become a central issue in relations between the U.S. and Russia over the past year. In October, U.S. President Joe Biden convened a roster of countries to talk ransomware, conspicuously leaving Russia out of the discussion. 

U.S. authorities went on to conduct more aggressive international operations to find leaders of ransomware gangs. A consistent allegation has been that Russian President Putin tacitly condones the operations of cyber criminals within Russia as long as they do not target Russian entities. 

© 2021 The Block Crypto, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Go to Source
Author: Kollen Post

Crypto data firm Lukka hits $1.3 billion valuation with new funding round

Lukka, a crypto firm that provides data services and enterprise software tools, has raised $110 million in a Series E funding round and is now valued at $1.3 billion.

Global asset manager Marshall Wace led Lukka’s Series E round, with Miami International Holdings, Summer Capital, and SiriusPoint also participating.

Previous investors Soros Fund Management, Liberty City Ventures, S&P Global, and CPA.com also joined the round, who all contributed to Lukka’s $53 million Series D funding in March 2021.

With fresh capital in hand, New York-based Lukka plans to expand globally. Lukka CEO Robert Materazzi said with the crypto industry entering a new phase of maturity, the need for the firm’s data and software tools will grow further.

Founded in 2014, Lukka mainly serves institutional clients with middle and back-office software and data tools. Its customers include crypto exchanges, miners, financial institutions, and accounting firms.

“Lukka’s comprehensive suite of reporting and analytics software and data solutions enables clients to meet a rapidly evolving set of critical needs,” said Steven Binetter, portfolio manager at Marshall Wace. “As crypto assets and blockchain redefine global commerce, Lukka is building the infrastructure for this future.”

The Series E round brings Lukka’s total funding to date to over $200 million. The firm has previously raised more than $90 million in various funding rounds.

© 2021 The Block Crypto, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Go to Source
Author: Yogita Khatri

Emilie Choi explains what Wall Street doesn’t understand about Coinbase


2021 was a watershed year for crypto exchange Coinbase. 

In addition to becoming the biggest cryptocurrency company to tap the public markets via a direct listing, the firm grew its total assets-on-platform to more than $255 billion, hired more than 3,000 people, and clocked in quarterly revenues above $1 billion during both the second and third quarters. 

Still, the company’s stock price has slid since its market debut in April, down by more than 31% since its first day of trading. The bearish sentiment is likely tied to the lack of predictability in Coinbase’s revenues, which are volatile and heavily dependent on trading fees.

During the latest episode of The Scoop, Coinbase president Emilie Choi said that Wall Street is focused too much on the predictability of short-term revenue rather than the much broader gameplan the company has for becoming a foundation for the emerging crypto-economy.

“We have obviously our flagship brokerage, and then we have the exchange and those are reinventing what a financial system can mean,” she said. “And then the final part of this strategy is about crypto as a new form of App Store, and there’s so much to tap into there.”

That shift could help diversify its revenue model, she added. 

“We have largely a trading model that generates a ton of revenue for us, and we love that model and we’re totally OK with the volatility of it. And at the same time, we’re investing very heavily in the subscription and services model, and you’re seeing a lot of growth from that because it’s the thing that helps us control our own destiny.”

To that end, Choi said the firm plans to pour more resources into its Coinbase Wallet. It is also expanding its subscription businesses — like Coinbase Cloud — as a means to grow its non-transaction-based revenue.

As such, it might not make sense for the exchange to be compared by financial analysts to exchanges like Nasdaq or brokerage firms like Interactive Brokers — at least not in Choi’s view. That said, it’s not easy for her to pinpoint exactly how investors should think about Coinbase — a fact that stems from the maturity level of crypto and web3.

Here’s Choi (emphasis is our own): 

“This goes back to what we were talking about with Tesla. Yeah. Is it a car company? And was Amazon like a book company? Was Square a purely financial services company? No. But with what you look at back in the day with Square, something like Square, was that it just took a lot of time for the Wall Street firms to figure out that it was just a completely new breed of something.

If the former M&A exec at LinkedIn had her druthers, analysts would view Coinbase within an entirely new category of web3. 

“We’re our own thing,” she said.

In this episode, Choi and The Block’s Frank Chaparro also discuss: 

  • Why Choi spends so much time on LinkedIn 
  • The 3 acts of Coinbase’s game plan to become the foundation of the web3 economy 
  • The inside story behind how Coinbase convinced one of the world’s large hedge funds to invest in its Series E during “Crypto Winter”
  • How Coinbase Ventures was conceived 
  • Why Choi is “very optimistic” about the US regulatory landscape
  • Coinbase’s culture and why the firm is giving employees four weeks off to recharge

© 2021 The Block Crypto, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Go to Source
Author: Frank Chaparro


Follow by Email
Facebook20
Pinterest20
fb-share-icon
LinkedIn20
Share