FreeCryptoCurrency.Me

Free stocks and money too!

Author: samwsimpson_lyjt8578

Mapping out Tiger Global’s crypto portfolio

Quick Take

  • Tiger Global Management is a New York-based major hedge fund and venture capital investment firm with $95 billion in assets under management
  • Before 2020, aside from leading Coinbase’s $300 million Series E round in 2018, the firm had steered away from making investments in the blockchain/crypto sector
  • Since March 2021, the firm has led or participated in no less than 39 funding rounds across the crypto-sphere
  • This ecosystem map serves as an UPDATE to the previous Tiger Global portfolio map

This research piece is available exclusively to
members of The Block Research.
You can continue reading
this Research content on The Block Research.

Go to Source
Author: John Dantoni

Shake Shack trials giving out bitcoin to customers using Cash App: report

Want a side of bitcoin with your burger?

Shake Shack is reportedly offering customers crypto rewards for purchasing items through Cash App, which is a digital wallet offered by Block (formerly known as Square). 

Purchases made with Cash Card, Cash App’s debit card, and via Cash Boost, a rewards program, will receive 15% of their purchase back in bitcoin. 

The offer ends mid-March and will be available through searching for the promotion in the app under the Cash Boost program.

The move is a ploy to attract younger customers and test the water for the broader adoption of crypto by the business, according to comments made by executives to The Wall Street Journal

Jay Livingston, chief marketing officer of the chain, told the Journal that Shake Shack hasn’t yet seen demand for crypto payments so this will be an experiment testing the waters through rewards. 

It is also another sign of mainstream adoption of crypto by consumer brands, which have also flocked to utility NFTs. Utility NFTs offer both a digital experience and tangible value through product offerings and other perks. Earlier this year, brands such as GapCrocs, and Prada all moved into the NFT space. 

© 2022 The Block Crypto, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Go to Source
Author: Lucy Harley-McKeown

Revolut bans transfers in Russia and Belarus

British fintech firm Revolut has suspended key services in Russia and Belarus, joining a string of fintech firms pulling out of the region.

The $33 billion neobank stopped supporting money transfers to or from entities in Russia and Belarus from 12:00 GMT on March 4, according to a person familiar with the matter.

At the same time, users whose Revolut cards have been issued by financial institutions in Russia or Belarus will no longer be able to use those cards to top up their accounts.

The news comes amid sweeping economic sanctions against Russia following its invasion of Ukraine, which began on February 24 — with fintech firms adding to the pressure.

Earlier this week, remittance firm Wise suspended its services in Russia. Shortly after, Zepz, TransferGo and Remitly took similar actions.

Founded in 2015, Revolut offers a range of payment, investment and money management services through a mobile app. The startup became the most valuable private tech company in UK history when it raised $800 million in July of last year.

The conflict in Ukraine is deeply personal for Revolut’s co-founders Nikolay Storonsky and Vlad Yatsenko, who were born in Russia and Ukraine, respectively. They both also hold British citizenship.  

On March 1, Storonsky issued a statement condemning the war and calling it “wrong and totally abhorrent.”

Revolut has some of its more than 2,150 staff based in both Russia and Ukraine, and Storonsky said that he had to consider the wellbeing of those based in Russia before making any statement on the conflict.

“They have done nothing wrong; they have simply helped build Revolut, supporting their own families through their hard work, just like their colleagues in Ukraine (or London or New York or Sydney or Mumbai, or anywhere else in the world where our people are based). I was, and remain, mindful of them in all of my actions,” he said.

© 2022 The Block Crypto, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Go to Source
Author: Ryan Weeks

Ethereum miners generated $1.19 billion in revenues during February

Ethereum miners brought in $1.19 billion in revenue in February.

Most of these revenues came from the block subsidy ($1.09 billion) and only a small portion from transaction fees ($109.77 million).

The numbers reveal a decrease in revenue totals for the third month in a row, with a month-over-month decrease of 15.3% between January and February.

Total revenues were $2.07 billion in November 2021 and have been going down since. They hit an all-time high in May 2021, with a total of $2.4 billion.

For more must-read figures from around the digital asset space, read the February by-the-numbers breakdown by The Block Research’s Lars Hoffmann (Research subscription required). 

© 2022 The Block Crypto, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Go to Source
Author: Catarina Moura

[SPONSORED] Router Protocol Integrates Avalanche to its Cross-Chain Messaging Protocol

Router Protocol – an infrastructure layer enabling communication between blockchains, today announced that it has integrated Avalanche network’s C-Chain to its cross-chain messaging protocol. Users now have the ability to utilize the true potential of the Avalanche network by performing cross-chain transfers and swaps between Polygon, Binance Smart Chain (BSC), and Avalanche C-chain. 

“Avalanche’s integration marks a significant step forward for Router and advances our mission of achieving a multi-blockchain future,” said Ramani Ramachandran, co-founder and chief executive of Router Protocol. 

“As blockchain ecosystems continue to grow, they are becoming increasingly siloed and unconnected from each other, preventing the industry from reaching its full potential.

What’s currently available on the Router?   

  • A proprietary pathfinder algorithm that aggregates DEXes to find the best rates for cross-chain swaps. On the Avalanche side, Router plugs into Trader Joe and Pangolin — two of the most liquid DEXes on the network — to power cross-chain swaps. Router is plugged into multiple AMMs, including PancakeSwap on BSC and Dfyn, SushiSwap, and QuickSwap exchange on Polygon.
  • Seamless cross-chain swaps: Avalanche eco-system users can buy digital assets on Polygon or BSC in a single transaction without leaving the Avalanche network. Similarly, users from Polygon or BSC can buy any Avalanche ecosystem tokens without leaving the respective chains.

  • 1:1 low-fees asset transfer of assets like USDC, AVAX. MATIC, and BNB.

  • Fast finality: Settlement for most transactions is less than one minute. 

The news comes following Router’s mainnet launch on Polygon and Binance Smart Chain (BSC) in January after raising $4.1 million from leading investors including Coinbase Ventures, Alameda Research, QCP, Polygon, and Wintermute.

What’s coming next for Router: 

More EVM chains: Router Protocol is going to cover almost all major EVM chains.

Cross Chain Explorer: An explorer to see exactly how cross-chain transfers and swaps happen on different chains. This will give users more transparency and make debugging easier.

Incentivized staking & liquidity mining programs: Router will create various staking and liquidity mining programs for rewarding those who provide liquidity to Router bridge.

Router Software Developer Kit (SDK): Currently scheduled for May 2022, the SDK will include tools for developers to utilize Router’s  cross-chain messaging system to build cross-chain dapps. Instead of dApps that function on multiple chains separately, developers will be able to build dApps that use multiple chains in tandem. 

Non-EVM chain: Router will introduce its first non-EVM chain in the second quarter of 2022.

Router V2 Prototype: A prototype of the Router blockchain designed as a cross-chain first blockchain with a focus on enabling messaging across chains.

More Validators: Router Protocol will onboard new validators and then transition to a model where anyone can become a validator.

For more information about Router Protocol and its mission to revolutionize cross-chain interoperability visit www.routerprotocol.com.

About Router Protocol

Router Protocol is building a suite of cross-chain liquidity infra primitives that aims to seamlessly provide bridging infrastructure between current and emerging Layer 1 and Layer 2 blockchain solutions. 

© 2022 The Block Crypto, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Go to Source
Author: Sponsored

Circle delays its DeFi API product, citing need for regulatory guidance

Crypto payments infrastructure provider and stablecoin issuer Circle has delayed its DeFi application programming interface (API) product, citing the need for further regulatory guidance on its rollout.

APIs allow businesses to more simply access each others’ systems and Circle had announced the product via a blog post shared by CEO Jeremy Allaire on Twitter back in June last year. He promised “seamless, safe, secure and regulated infrastructure for accessing and building on DeFi lending markets”.

The DeFi API product, which would’ve initially helped businesses access Compound on the Ethereum network, has now been delayed and resources instead dedicated to launching the Circle Yield product and making the USDC stablecoin available on new blockchains, Circle said in a statement to The Block today. In the aforementioned blog post, users are no longer able to register interest, with the “join the waitlist” link leading back to the Circle homepage. 

“We continue to focus on empowering institutions to send, spend and secure USDC and unlock new ways of doing business with the suite of services available through Circle Account,” the company said. “The timing of the DeFi API product rollout will be guided by developments in, and the availability of, further regulatory guidance, enhanced compliance tools, and blockchain identity protocols.”

Circle’s spokesperson didn’t immediately respond to a question on the exact timing of the revised launch date.

The company has had a busy few months, launching USDC on the Hedera network in October and renegotiating a deal to join the stock market through a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) in February. Circle reevaluated the terms of its SPAC deal to double its proposed valuation from $4.5 billion to $9 billion last month as it pushes ahead with its plans to go public.

© 2022 The Block Crypto, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Go to Source
Author: Tom Matsuda

Brazil’s central bank selects nine CBDC projects to move forward in innovation challenge

Brazil’s central bank revealed today that it has picked nine projects to move forward in its quest to develop a central bank digital currency (CBDC). 

The projects will move forward through an innovation lab co-managed by the bank. The lab, known as LIFT for its name in Portuguese, selected projects from companies including established banks, a DeFi protocol and an important crypto exchange. This exercise aims to research possible use cases for a digital Brazilian real, and the technical feasibility of various methods for getting there.

According to details released by Brazil’s central bank, LIFT has decided to advance the following projects with the aim of developing the digital real: 

  • Aave – An open-source, non-custodial liquidity protocol whose CBDC project deals with forming a liquidity pool for offering loans
  • Banco Santander Brasil – A major bank working on a delivery versus payment (DvP) project to tokenize ownership rights for vehicles and property
  • Febraban – Brazil’s banking federation, working on a DvP project
  • Giesecke + Devrient – A German payment security company whose proposal centers on dual offline payments (when both the entities sending and receiving the money are offline)
  • Itaú Unibanco (With B3 and R3) – A major Brazilian financial services company, working on a payment versus payment (PvP) project for international payments 
  • Mercado Bitcoin (with Bitrust and CPqD)–  Latin America’s largest crypto exchange, working on a DvP project focused on crypto assets
  • TecBan (with Capitual)– An independent ATM network operator focused on open banking, which proposed an internet-of-things (IOT)-based logistics solution for e-commerce
  • VERT (with Digital Asset and Oliver Wyman)– a tokenization project for rural financing
  • Visa of Brazil, ConsenSys and Microsoft – Looking at using a DeFi solution for financing small and medium-sized businesses

According to the project’s published timeline, an implementation phase will run between March 28 and July 29. The central bank has previously indicated plans to decide on the finalized version of a CBDC in 2024, following the innovation lab in 2022 and pilot projects in 2023. 

LIFT received 47 proposals from 43 different companies, according to the press announcement. The companies are from Brazil, Germany, the U.S., Israel, Mexico, Portugal, the U.K. and Sweden. 

The digital real challenge is one of 11 projects that LIFT launched in 2021. The others have to do with topics such as open banking, simplifying digital payments, customer empowerment and paying taxes through a digital wallet.

© 2022 The Block Crypto, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Go to Source
Author: Kristin Majcher

A look at MetaMask, Infura, OpenSea and the countries they do not serve

There have been multiple reports in the last day of users being unable to access crypto services, namely MetaMask, Infura and OpenSea, in certain jurisdictions, such as Iran and Venezuela.

Many have pointed to MetaMask’s support page as an explanation. Earlier today, it said that MetaMask and Infura weren’t available in certain jurisdictions for compliance reasons. It has since been updated to say that Infura isn’t available in such jurisdictions, and this impacts MetaMask because it uses Infura by default.

For context, MetaMask is a wallet that uses Infura — a blockchain node infrastructure — to connect to the Ethereum network. 

Yet this wasn’t exactly a recent change. This page has actually had the original message since at least April 2021 (as it was shared in a Reddit post at the time).

Instead, Infura blamed the issues on its own misconfigurations. The team said, “In changing some configurations as a result of the new sanctions directives from the United States and other jurisdictions, we mistakenly configured the settings more broadly than they needed to be.” It has since fixed the issue, restoring access to many of its users.

Yet even though this was an error, the site does restrict access to certain countries.

“Infura closely monitors changes to US sanctions programs announced by the Office of Foreign Assets Control and narrowly tailors its internal controls to comply with the law. Currently, those regions are Iran, North Korea, Cuba, Syria, and the Crimea, Donetsk, and Luhansk regions of Ukrain,” said a spokesperson for Infura.

“Infura’s compliance with the law is required and does not necessarily reflect the service’s views on any public policy issue,” they added.

As for MetaMask, it tweeted that “MetaMask is a client-side wallet that strives to make the blockchain maximally accessible to everyone.”

MetaMask has not yet responded by press time whether it restricts access to any jurisdictions — although the updated text on its support page suggests that it doesn’t, by only stating that Infura blocks access to such jurisdictions.

The same goes for OpenSea

While it received less attention, some users were complaining about losing access to NFT marketplace OpenSea. A

n NFT creator called Bornosor tweeted that his OpenSea account was either deactivated or deleted without notice. They added that they had heard similar reports from other Iranian artists and collectors.

It turns out that OpenSea matches Infura on restricting access in such jurisdictions.

“OpenSea blocks users and territories on the U.S. sanctions list from using our services – including buying, selling, or transferring NFTs on OpenSea – and our Terms of Service explicitly prohibit sanctioned users or users in sanctioned territories from using our service,” said a spokesperson for OpenSea.

The spokesperson added:

“We have a zero tolerance policy for the use of our services by sanctioned individuals or entities and people located in sanctioned countries. If we find individuals to be in violation of our sanctions policy, we take swift action to ban the associated accounts.”

A list of the countries that are under US sanctions are can be found on The Department of the Treasury’s website.

© 2022 The Block Crypto, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Go to Source
Author: Tim Copeland

Governments are on high alert for crypto in Russian sanctions evasion that nobody has seen yet

Public figures in the US and Europe have spoken with growing alarm about the threat of Russian sanctions evasion via crypto. As it stands, those fears remain unsubstantiated. 

The US, EU, UK, and the rest of the G7 nations have imposed crushing sanctions on Russia in response to the invasion of Ukraine. Amid the activity, a flurry of reports as to the risk of Russia using cryptocurrencies to evade those sanctions has emerged from major news outlets. The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg and Politico were among many to join the chorus, with sensational titles like “Russia’s hidden tool to undermine sanctions.”

The past several days have seen that reporting translated into political discourse presenting a tough front on crypto. 

On February 28, Senators Elizabeth Warren retweeted the NYT report, saying “U.S. financial regulators need to take this threat seriously and increase their scrutiny of digital assets.” Two days later, Warren’s office published a letter co-signed by three other democrats of the Senate Banking Committee asking the Treasury to account for OFACs work on sanction

The threat has picked up globally. “We are taking measures in particular on cryptocurrencies and crypto assets, which should not be used to circumvent sanctions,” said French finance minister Bruno Le Maire on March 2. 

But while everyone is on high alert for crypto in sanctions evasion, it remains speculation at this point, seemingly a product of immediate media attention. 

Jerome Powell, chair of the Federal Reserve, made this clear in response to questions on crypto’s role in sanctions evasion on March 2, noted in his testimony before Congress: “I don’t really know the extent to which it’s happening, but you read about it in the paper.”

The prevalence of alarms over crypto instead emphasizes that crypto has become a hot-button issue, one that can command even more attention when combined with the war in Ukraine, which has dominated the news for the past two weeks. That attention then translates into standing political objectives.

Evidence of crypto use

To be fair, there are limited signs that crypto use is on the rise in Eastern Europe, including Russia. Some have been remarkably positive for the industry, especially Ukraine’s implementation of crypto wallets to gather global donations.  

As far as broader use, The Block recently reported that Binance had seen a factor of three increase in ruble volume. Chainalysis data across a broader set of centralized exchanges suggested an 8x rise in ruble/BTC volume, with hryvnia, the currency of Ukraine, seeing smaller increases. 

While those figures are meaningful, the actual numbers in question are in the tens of millions in USD terms. Relative to the needs of the Russian government and oligarchy in the crosshairs of Western sanctions, this represents just a slice. 

Coin Dance’s data from peer-to-peer Bitcoin marketplace LocalBitcoins showed that ruble-to-BTC trading went from 34 to 41 BTC between the weeks of February 19 and February 26. This factor that was slightly higher when measured in rubles because the value of the ruble has tanked over the same timeframe. 

 

Source: Coin Dance

Again, this increase is meaningful, but 41 BTC is worth roughly $1.75 million as of publication time. That is, again, insignificant for a sovereign Russian economy or even for the purposes of an individual member of Russia’s ruling class. 

…but evasion? 

Even the executive branch itself seems fairly hesitant to spotlight crypto in sanctions. 

On March 2, Hannah Lang of Reuters quoted National Security Council’s director of cybersecurity Carole House as saying that the scale of Russia’s needs “would almost certainly render cryptocurrency as an ineffective primary tool for the state.”

The Politico report likewise quoted a Treasury official saying that the scale at which Russia needs to operate renders crypto relatively unconcerning.

“Obviously, Russia’s going to try anything and everything they can to avoid sanctions. Digital assets will likely be one way, but it’s not going to be material,” Jorge Pesok, general counsel for Tacen, told The Block. 

Crypto was front and center in a batch of sanctions targeting ransomware last year. That move has, more recently, become legal grounds for the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Asset Control, or OFAC, to fill out its own sanctions policy

In some sense, those tools have become useful in the present moment. For example, they left the door open to sanction Russian actors interfering with democratic processes, which at the time meant hacks like SolarWinds but now applies to a full invasion that appears intent on removing the democratically elected Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelensky. 

However, ransomware gangs can operate via crypto in a way that a multi-trillion-dollar economy cannot. Russia has been subject to various sanctions for years, and has done a lot to build up its sanctions resistance.

Despite those efforts, the recent sanctions are proving effective. But leaks remain, albeit in more traditional finance. On February 27, the Central Bank of Russia announced its commitment to making CPFS, the local equivalent to SWIFT, work for Russian banks. It is also trying to get foreign banks to use it, a fairly doomed prospect. 

As far as sanctioned individuals, they are more likely to turn to the means of capital flight that Russia’s oligarchs have used for decades: shell companies, offshore accounts and real estate purchased anonymously. 

Research published in 2018 found that the top 0.01% of Russia’s wealthiest held over 12% of the country’s household wealth and stored a majority of that wealth overseas. The Biden administration is busy targeting those assets. The Treasury, for example, published a new set of sanctions on relatives of known oligarchs on March 3. . But despite its relative insignificance in scale, crypto is relatively eye-catching when it comes to news.

So, for the time being, everyone – including industry experts – remains on the lookout. 

One of those watching intently is Adam Zarazinsky. Inca Digital, Zarazinski’s company, both monitors blockchain activity and applies natural language processing to open sources like social media to identify intelligence for government agencies. Clients include the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the US Special Operations Command.  

While Zarazinski is among many looking for crypto coming out of Russia, he similarly says that any allegation remains uncertain. “We’re still in this kind of fog of war, where we don’t necessarily know everything yet,” he told The Block.

“Is the opportunity there? Yeah, I think it is,” Zarazinski continued. “I think it’s possible, I do not think it’s like, ‘alarm bells, we need to shut down crypto right now.’”

© 2022 The Block Crypto, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Go to Source
Author: Kollen Post

The SEC is considering crypto recommendations for its custody rule

The Securities and Exchange Commission is considering new recommendations on crypto for investment advisers and investment companies, according to recent remarks.

William Birdthistle, Director of the Division of Investment Management, addressed the emergence of crypto in an address to the IAA Investment Adviser Compliance Conference. The division of investment management oversees rulemaking related to investment advisers. During his remarks, Birdthistle said he is considering ways to “bring order” to the crypto industry. 

“For investment advisers, I am cognizant of questions about how providing advice regarding crypto assets impacts compliance with the Act, particularly aspects of the custody rule,” he said.

The custody rule, also known as the Advisers Act, requires advisers to hold a client’s securities with a designated qualified custodian. Qualified custodians are essentially banks, broker-dealers and trusts licensed on the federal or state levels. Some crypto firms have already nabbed the designation, like Coinbase’s custody service and Anchorage Digital Bank.

But in the past, it’s been unclear how the SEC views the designation on a state level. The SEC asked for public comments on qualified custodians as they relate to digital assets in the wake of Wyoming’s decision to grant a no action letter to Two Ocean, a wealth management firm facilitating crypto investing that positioned itself publicly as a qualified custodian. 

The questions in that letter solicited feedback on how digital assets are held in custody and what protections are sought out by advisers when looking for a custodian.

Birdthistle said he plans to consider recommendations related to a variety of comments received on topics related to securities use on digital asset venues.

“The expanding opportunities to invest in securities directly using digital platforms, such as robo-advisers, online brokerages, and mobile investment apps and portals, also present challenges,” he said. “I look forward to considering recommendations in light of the comments we have received in this area.”

© 2022 The Block Crypto, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Go to Source
Author: Aislinn Keely


Follow by Email
Facebook20
Pinterest20
fb-share-icon
LinkedIn20
Share